Showing posts with label Republicans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Republicans. Show all posts

Thursday, June 28, 2007

New poll shows insight of Republican beliefs

Honestly, this poll surprised me. But it also gave me some hope.

We have been living with an admin that wanted to divide and conquer by stiring up the differences between the right and the left. So often I have watched C-SPAN's Washington Journal and have heard the people favoring Bush go on and on how wonderful he is. And the Talk Radio shows where the host riles up the people and tells them what to say. And the hatred was so extreme from these people. And the Religious right stiring the embers of division didn't help either.

But this poll gave me a little hope that their are some reasonable people in this nation.

From the Hill:

Poll shows many Republicans favor universal healthcare, gays in military
By Aaron Blake
June 28, 2007
A large nationwide poll of Republican voters shows that an increasing number consider themselves conservative, that about half favor universal healthcare and allowing gays in the military, and that the vast majority say spreading democracy shouldn’t be the United States’ top foreign policy goal.

The poll, conducted by GOP consultant Tony Fabrizio 10 years after he conducted a similar study, also casts some doubts on the conventional wisdom about moral-issues voters, thought to be the key constituency for President Bush in 2004. It showed that the group hasn’t grown significantly in recent years and is surprisingly willing to vote for former New York
Mayor Rudy Giuliani despite his differences with it on social and moral issues.

The survey of 2,000 self-described Republican voters, titled “The Elephant Looks in the Mirror 10 Years Later,” showed that 71 percent consider themselves conservative, a 16 percent increase over the 1997 numbers.

Fifty-one percent of the GOPers said universal healthcare coverage should be a right of every American, and 49 percent favored allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the military.

Those two issues continue to divide the party, though, with more than 40 percent opposed to both. Fabrizio emphasized that “the devil is in the details” on healthcare, and that providing a plan that pleases the entire 51 percent would be difficult.

Nearly four in five Republicans said that U.S. foreign policy should be based on protecting economic and national security interests, versus 16 percent who preferred basing it on spreading democracy.

Fabrizio described it as a test of support for the “Bush Doctrine.”

“We’re not about spreading democracy around the world; we’re about doing what’s best for us,” Fabrizio said. “Even the [pro-Iraq war] ‘Bush hawks’ don’t buy it.”

“Bush hawks” was one of seven groups into which the survey categorized voters. The others were “moralists,” “government knows best Republicans,” “Dennis Miller Republicans,” “fortress America Republicans,” “heartland Republicans” and “free marketeers.”

The “moralist” section of the party — those focused overwhelmingly on social and moral issues — has grown only slightly since 1997, to just less than a quarter of Republicans.

At the same time, economics-focused “free-marketeer” and “heartland-Republican” voters decreased drastically, from about half to less than 20 percent, while two new foreign policy-focused groups — “Bush hawks” and “fortress America Republicans” — took in most of their ex-members.

Of course further down in the article the poll shows that what is important to the Republicans now is leadership and think that (ugh) Giuliani fits that bill. What a bubble burster that was!! At least the majority are in favor of Universal Health CAre and Gays in the military.

Thursday, March 22, 2007

LA Times: Making a list of reasons for firing U.S. attorneys

With all the good performance records of these US Attorneys, someone has to show why they were fired. So lets make a list, after the fact, that shows these Attorneys did have performance problems.

From the LA Times:
Justice Department memos show performance issues were being detailed after the fact in order to justify the terminations.
By Richard A. Serrano, Times Staff Writer
March 21, 2007


WASHINGTON — Senior Justice Department officials began drafting memos this month listing specific reasons why they had fired eight U.S. attorneys, intending to cite performance problems such as insubordination, leadership failures and other missteps if needed to convince angry congressional Democrats that the terminations were justified.

The memos, organized as charts with entries for each of the federal prosecutors and labeled "for internal DOJ use only," offer new details about disputes over policy, priorities and management styles between the department and several of its U.S. attorneys.

The prosecutors' shortcomings also were listed in a talking-points memo, indicating the willingness of the Justice Department to make public what are normally confidential personnel matters in order to counter its critics.

Justice Department officials hoped that documenting specific reasons for terminating the prosecutors would satisfy demands for more information after Atty. Gen. Alberto R. Gonzales and his deputy, Paul J. McNulty, described the dismissals as vaguely "performance-related."

According to the charts, as well as e-mails and other documents made public Monday and Tuesday, Carol C. Lam in San Diego was dismissed for not prosecuting more firearms and border smuggling cases, and for repeatedly missing deadlines.

How dumb do they think we are!?! Or how blatant and arrogant can they be!?!

It's time to stop this crime syndicate of a government we have.