Reid making a bit of sense today

Harry Reid (D) Nevada, strongly urged Max Baucus (D) Montana, to drop a proposal to tax health benefits and stop chasing Republican votes on a massive health care reform bill per Roll Call.

Yes, you read right. Reid doesn't care about bi-partisanship for this Healthcare bill. He sent this message to Baucus after Consulting with Senate Dems after the Tuesday morning leadership meeting.

According to Democratic sources, Reid told Baucus that taxing health benefits and failing to include a strong government-run insurance option of some sort in his bill would cost 10 to 15 Democratic votes; Reid told Baucus that several in the Conference had serious concerns and that it wasn’t worth securing the support of Grassley and at best a few additional Republicans.

By Tuesday afternoon, the Finance Committee began looking at ways other than taxing health benefits to deliver a health care overhaul that costs less than $1 trillion and is deficit-neutral, as Baucus wants. Baucus’ office declined to comment, but Senate Budget Chairman Kent Conrad (D-N.D.), a key member of Finance, confirmed as much late Tuesday.

“I would say there’s a search for alternatives,” Conrad told reporters. “There’s been feedback. There’s been additional questions in terms of getting the votes and public support.”

Maybe some of us are making inroads with some of the Senators letting them know what we expect of them. Maybe.

The article goes on to report:

The source added that the meeting then devolved into “a cacophony of voices against bipartisanship” because Senate leaders could not reconcile how they could attract Republicans without sacrificing too many Democrats.

Bingo! They would lose too many Democrats! And I would venture to say, Independents as well!

And then you have the centrists, better known as the Blue Dog Dems that said:

However, the Democratic source said the leadership’s decision could backfire by alienating other elements of the Democratic caucus, such as centrists.

“I’m concerned we’re going to be perceived as abandoning the Republicans,” the source said. “The demands Reid is putting on some Democrats is going to make it harder for other Democrats to support this. ... Going the partisan route doesn’t get this bill done any faster.”

So what the Blue Dogs are doing, in essence, is threatening to slow down the bill.

Here's the holdup:

Finance may not begin marking up its bill until next week or the week after that. Meanwhile, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee is set to complete the markup of its health care reform legislation this week or next. One senior Democratic Senate aide warned Tuesday that further delays by the Finance Committee could result in the planned merger of the two panels’ bills being scrapped in favor of allowing each one to move to the floor on its own.

The HELP bill is unanimously supported by the panel’s Democrats, with all Republicans opposed. It was drafted with liberal reform goals in mind, including health care policies that many Democrats have sought for decades.

“The longer Baucus takes, the trickier it gets,” a senior Democratic Senate aide said.

And the issue doesn’t just rest on Baucus’ shoulders. For Reid, up for re-election in 2010 and to whom Obama is looking for delivery of a top priority, the stakes are incredibly high.

Complicating matters, the Majority Leader must contend with powerful committee chairmen who are not a part of his leadership team, including Baucus and HELP Chairman Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.). Sen. Chris Dodd (Conn.), the No. 2 Democrat on HELP, has been managing the markup of that committee’s bill in the absence of Kennedy, who is battling brain cancer. Dodd has said he confers with Kennedy regularly.

There are more liberal Dems for the bill:

Reid also faces the challenge of reconciling two bills that have been developed with conflicting goals.

Particularly on whether to implement a government-run insurance option as a part of the overhaul, Reid must assuage a significant number of Democrats from conservative-leaning states who are either skeptical of or opposed to the proposal, while simultaneously keeping happy his liberals — whose numbers are greater.

Most Democrats, including Reid allies like Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Conference Vice Chairman Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), are enthusiastic backers of the government-run insurance option. The HELP Committee’s bill includes a robust government-run option; Finance on Tuesday was still haggling over several policies, including an acceptable compromise to the public plan component.

Now all we can do is keep the heat on all these people and see what happens.

Senate Committee Subpoenas Cheney, Whitehouse

From Think Progress:

Breaking: Domestic Surveillance Docs Subpoenaed
The Senate Judiciary Committee has subpoenaed the White House, Vice President Dick Cheney’s office, the Justice Department, and the National Security Council for documents related to President Bush’s warrantless domestic surveillance program. AP reports:

Also named in subpoenas signed by committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., were the Justice Department and the National Security Council.

The committee wants documents that might shed light on internal squabbles within the administration over the legality of the program, said a congressional official speaking on condition of anonymity because the subpoenas had not been made public.

Leahy’s committee authorized the subpoenas previously as part of its sweeping investigation into how much influence the White House exerts over the Justice Department and its chief, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

The probe, in its sixth month, began with an investigation into whether administration officials ordered the firings of eight federal prosecutors, for political reasons.

UPDATE: Statement from the Senate Judiciary Committee:

Chairman Leahy issued subpoenas to the Department of Justice, the Office of the White House, the Office of the Vice President and the National Security Council for documents relating to the Committee’s inquiry into the warrantless electronic surveillance program. […]

“Over the past 18 months, this Committee has made no fewer than nine formal requests to the Department of Justice and to the White House, seeking information and documents about the authorization of and legal justification for this program,” Chairman Leahy wrote in letters accompanying the subpoenas to Bush Administration officials. “All requests have been rebuffed. Our attempts to obtain information through testimony of Administration witnesses have been met with a consistent pattern of evasion and misdirection.”

UPDATE II: The committee vote was 13-3, with all Democrats and Sens. Arlen Specter (R-PA), Orrin Hatch (R-UT), and Charles Grassley (R-IA) voting for subpoenas.