Friday, June 29, 2007

Fired US Attorney, McKay, "My job wasn't to serve the Republican Party,"

And he speaks out about Gonzales as well.

From Oregon Live:

If anybody knows why U.S. Attorney John McKay was fired, he'd like to know.

In a speech Thursday night at Portland State University celebrating the launch of the Sidney Lezak Fellowships Program, McKay theorized why he was dismissed from his post in western Washington last year, along with eight other U.S. attorneys.

Some members of Congress have called for U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to resign in the wake of the firings, which some suspect were politically motivated.

Snip

McKay addressed a crowd of about 200 lawyers, judges and others, including the current U.S. attorney for Oregon, Karin Immergut. He stressed keeping the criminal justice system independent from political influence.

McKay, who was appointed by the Bush administration in 2001, said he was added to a list in March 2005 of U.S. attorneys to be fired. The action followed a close governor's election in Washington in 2004, won by Democrat Chris Gregoire, which Republicans had wanted him to investigate. He did not.

"My job wasn't to serve the Republican Party," he said.

While McKay denounced what he called a failure of leadership in the Justice Department and White House, he bemoaned questioning the ethics of all the department's staffers, especially when they investigate corruption by public officials.

"It is a reservoir of trust," McKay said of the Justice Department. "And so to do damage to that is a travesty."

McKay said he and the other fired U.S. attorneys decided to speak up about their dismissals after Gonzales testified to Congress that he would not use a provision in the U.S. Patriot Act to appoint replacements without congressional confirmation -- something the attorneys viewed as a lie under oath.

"I would have taken personal disappointment and even personal attack," McKay said. "But I couldn't be part of a lie."

He said he was personally hurt by Gonzales' actions because he had worked closely with him in the past and told lawyer friends it was good news when Gonzales was confirmed as attorney general.

"I said, 'You're gonna like this guy -- he's humble, he's honest, he's hard-working, and he's smart," McKay said. "And he's proved me wrong."

Telling...

~~McKay said he and the other fired U.S. attorneys decided to speak up about their dismissals after Gonzales testified to Congress that he would not use a provision in the U.S. Patriot Act to appoint replacements without congressional confirmation -- something the attorneys viewed as a lie under oath.~~

The only way to stop this administration's corruption, lies, secrecy, is to start impeachment investigations. Although many think this would stop the business of the congress, much now is not being accomplished because there is still an imbalance there. And if we, as a nation, do not address these problems now, what will stop future administrations from trying to do the same thing. This already has happened twice in my lifetime. First the Nixon Admin and now the Bush admin. Wake up America!

9 comments:

Fernando said...

Well done toniD. Wake up America!

Anonymous said...

Hi Gang!
new
Submitted by Peter Dragon on Fri, 06/29/2007 - 11:31am.
Just finished reading over the big hassle on the blog over the

last couple of days. TONI...if you're reading.....If you go

away, I will miss you......TERRIBLY! You are the blog's best

shortcut to what's going on! I am sure that I am just one

blogger here that loves ya!

Anonymous said...

I'm with you on this one, toniD. The argument goes like this:

They: "Impeachment proceedings (or investigations) are disruptive to the business of the nation."

Us: "A succession of high officials will increasingly flex their corrupt and over-stepping muscles until they are reined-in with a legal smackdown."

In other words, it is inevitable that the limits will eventually be pushed to an extreme requiring investigations and/or impeachments. Putting it off (because it is "disruptive") only adds to the amount of corruption that we endure in the meantime which is, itself, disruptive.

And, as you note, precedents such as the short-circuiting of Nixon's impeachment via a presidential pardon add to the "teflon" confidence of future high officials.

Crank Bait

Anonymous said...

grateful to fernando for posting link to your blog. I loved reading your posts on the MR blog -- got most of my news from you! :) -- and missed you. (just bookmarked this page)

toniD said...

Hi all

Thanks for the vote of confidence.

Have you noticed the lack of anons on the blog?

I saw only one and that was Shell b4 she signed in.

Maybe Sam did ban the offending anon.

From Sam:

tonid-
sorry we didn't get your request in time.... and very sorry to hear you're leaving the blog, your posts bring a lot to the blog and no one pulls stories like you pull stories.....

Are you proposing no anons allowed on the blog? I'm not sure if I can do that as it sort of goes against my desire not to have a registration requirement but I'll give it some thought... I hope to see you back on, though
sam

So I may come back. I asked Sam to ban the anon and any that attack people on the blog. I hope he will.

Anonymous said...

Sheesh! Like Fernando's head isn't big enough already.

Crank "Shopping For Fernando In The Hydrocephalic Haberdashery" Bait

toniD said...

Leaving for work

Later

Unknown said...

miss ya already!

Anonymous said...

I really appreciate(d) your contributions to the Seder blog, and hope to see you back there soon.

-pee.ey.yoo.el